Two statements that specially resonated with me:
- "If you cannot tell what the code does by glancing at the naming convention and several code lines, then the code is too complicated".
- "I hate reading code that was written to show off the developer's knowledge of the language, and I shouldn't need to go through 25 files before I can really understand what a piece is really doing".
Needed "Renovation"
Personally, I consider SGBSV - or any of the other names in the function - fails the test mentioned in the first quote above. But I suppose it makes sense to people who use the CERN mathematical library. Considering Fortran 90 permits names with 31 characters, I think the routines need to be "renovated".
No comments:
Post a Comment